Opinion

Positive saliva test row: My friend never has weed!

ON Monday I spent an interesting few hours in Lismore court.

I supported a friend who, after being saliva tested, was charged with driving a motor vehicle with illicit drugs in his blood.

After testing positive for weed at a roadside testing, he had to go to the police station to take another test, which showed negative.

Nevertheless this test was sent to Sydney for a 'really sophisticated test' as the magistrate put it, and guess what?

That came out positive as well!

Now this is a miracle, a swindle or plainly a faulty test because my friend never, really never, and I would swear on that, consumes any weed.

How did it get into his saliva is still unknown to this day.

Some people suggest that THC can easily be absorbed as a passive smoker, or by absorption through touching something that someone else, with THC in their system, has touched before.

The company who makes the saliva tests (Draeger) prides itself on their website to get drug detection done meticulously.

These are their words to a little cartoon on their site: 'We are finding the needle in the haystack! Detecting THC to 0.000 000 05 gram.'

I witnessed 6 other saliva drug-testing cases, before my friend's case.

Every time the case is dismissed using 'section 10'.

This can happen if you plead guilty, it's your first drug offence and if you have a reasonably clean driving record.

Any person who got a test with a false result faces a dilemma though.

If they plead not guilty it is very unpredictable what is going to happen next.

If they plead guilty they will be let off.

So my friend pleaded guilty for an offence that he did not commit - case dismissed!

The only trouble is, if he gets pulled up within the next 5 years, gets tested and comes out positive, the first offence will be counted also.

It can happen to anyone to be tested, and there is no absolutely sure way to protect yourself from testing positive because the saliva tests are not reliable and consistent in their results.

You could test positive first, then negative and then positive again, like my friend and some of the others I saw in court today.

Such a waste of resources, time and energy! 

Police are wasting their time for useless roadside tests and the court system is clogged up with petty stuff. 

And as an 'offender' if you don't get a reasonable magistrate, you'll end up losing your driving license for a while, which has huge implications in a place with very limited public transport. 

Another weird fact is that the offence was 'illicit drugs in his blood' - yet no blood was taken!

It has been reported that some people who are chemically sensitive showed allergic reactions after taking tests.

The highway police have no fact sheet about the tests and do not know the active ingredients.

- Mary Sweet

Topics:  court drug drugs drug testing



Under-16 Digger looks back on life well lived

Roy Crossley served as a gunner in the Second World War in the Pacific.

Enlistment was a relief to 14-year-old from Outback

Showing support for Tweed businesswomen

SUPPORTING CHARITY: Sonya Lee, Jenette Condon, Julie West, Belinda Dinsey, Sharon Styman and Katie Harley are planning the next Wisdom Embracing Youth luncheon.

Wisdom embraces youth at charity luncheon.

Burringbar residents divided over Telstra tower

PHONE RECEPTION: Burringbar might be getting a new Telstra mobile phone tower.

A Telstra mobile phone tower proposal has divided the community.

Local Partners